Global News Post Fastest Global News Portal
Related Articles
“We’re on AI time,” that is what I inform folks now when they are trying to appreciate the speedy tempo of AI and all hooked up applied sciences, developments.
Even despite the fact that it is been simply two and a part years since OpenAI unleashed ChatGPT at the global, I’ve identified intuitively for months that on the earth of era, we’re not working on Moore’s Law: the selection of transistors on a chip doubles each two years. This is now AI Model Law, during which generative fashion features are doubling each 3 months.
Even if you do not imagine that Large Language Models (LLMs) are growing at that tempo, there is no denying the exceptional velocity of adoption.
A brand new document (or somewhat a 340-page presentation) from Mary Meeker, a normal spouse at BOND investments, paints the clearest image but of the transformative nature of AI and the way it is in contrast to some other earlier tech epoch.
“The pace and scope of change related to the artificial intelligence technology evolution is indeed unprecedented, as supported by the data,” wrote Meeker and her co-authors.
Google, what?
One stat in particular stood out to me: It took Google nine years to reach 365 billion annual searches. ChatGPT reached the same milestone in two years.
Meeker’s presentation illustrates something I’ve been trying to articulate for some time. There’s never been a time quite like this.
I’ve lived through some big tech changes: The rise of personal computing, the switch from analog to digital publishing tools, and the online revolution. Most of this change was gradual, though, granted, it did feel rapid at the time.
I first saw digital publishing tools in the mid-1970s, and it wasn’t until the middle-to-late 1980s that many of us made the switch, which is also around the time personal computers started to arrive, though they wouldn’t become ubiquitous for at least another decade.
AI Time leaves little time, I think, for self-reflection.
With the public internet arriving in 1993, it would be years before most people were on broadband. Knowledge workers didn’t rise up immediately. Instead, there was a slow and steady shift in the workforce.
I’d say we had a decade of solid adjustment before the Internet and its associated systems and platforms became an inexorable part of our lives.
I still remember just how confused the average person was by the Internet. On The Today Show in 1994, the hosts literally asked aloud, “What is the Internet?” AI and platforms like ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude AI, and others have not met with the similar degree of misunderstanding.
Sign us up
Meeker’s report notes that ChatGPT users skyrocketed from zero in October 2020 to 400M in late 2024 and 800M in 2025. A shocking 20M people are paying subscribers. It took decades to convince people to pay for any content on the Internet, but for AI, people are already lining up with their wallets open.
I suppose the rise of the internet and ubiquitous and mobile computing might have prepared us for the AI Era. It’s not as if artificial intelligence appeared out of the blue. Then again, it sort of did.
Almost a decade ago, we were marveling at IBM’s Deep Blue, the primary AI to overcome a Chess Grandf Master, Gary Kasparov. That was once adopted in 2005 by way of an self sustaining automobile finishing the DARPA problem. A decade after that, we noticed DeepThoughts AlphaGo beat the world’s best Go player.
Some of these developments were startling, but they were arriving at a relatively digestible pace. Even so, things started to pick up in 2016, and various groups began sounding the warning bells about AI. No one was publicly using the terms “LLM” or “generative.” Still, the worry was once such that IBM, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, and Google’s DeepThoughts shaped the nonprofit Partnership on AI, which was once meant to “deal with alternatives and demanding situations with AI applied sciences to profit folks and society.”
That crew nonetheless exists, despite the fact that, I’m now not certain any individual is taking note of its suggestions. AI Time leaves little time, I feel, for self-reflection.
Image 1 of 2
A 2016 Stanford University Study on AI in 2030 (not to be had on-line) famous that “Contrary to the extra improbable predictions for AI in the preferred press, the Study Panel discovered no reason for fear that AI is an coming near near risk to humankind.”
Meeker’s presentation, despite the fact that, items an speeded up image that, I feel, does carry some reason for fear, with one caveat: the predictions come from ChatGPT (which is an excellent larger reason for fear).
By 2030, for example, it predicts AI’s talent to create full-length motion pictures and video games. I’d say Gemini’s Veo 3 is evidence we are smartly on our approach.
It guarantees AI’s talent to perform human-like robots. I might upload that AI time has speeded up humanoid robot building in some way I, in my 25 years of overlaying robotics, have by no means noticed earlier than.
It says AI will construct and run self sustaining companies.
In 10 years, ChatGPT believes AI will have the ability to simulate human-like minds.
If we understand that ChatGPT, like maximum LLMs, bases maximum of its wisdom at the identified universe, I feel we will be able to think that those predictions are, if anything else, underambitious. Even AI does not know what we do not know.
There was once some argument within the workplace that I had the equation unsuitable. There isn’t any AI Model Law, there is simply Huang’s Law (for Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia). This legislation predicts a doubling of GPU efficiency no less than each two years. Without the facility of the ones processors, AI stalls. Maybe, however I feel that the facility of those fashions has but to meet up with the processing energy equipped by way of Nvidia’s GPUs.
Huang is solely development for a long term during which each individual and industry needs GPU-based generative energy. That manner we’d like extra processors, extra records, and building leaps to organize for fashions to return. However, fashion building in real-time isn’t hindered by way of GPU building. Those generative updates are taking place a ways sooner than silicon developments.
If you settle for that there’s a factor corresponding to AI Time and that the AI Model Law (heck, let’s name it “Ulanoff’s Law”) is an actual factor, then it is simple to simply accept ChatGPT’s view of our imminent truth.
You may not be able for it, however it is coming the entire similar. I ponder what ChatGPT thinks about that.
You may additionally like
Source hyperlink
