Global News Post Fastest Global News Portal
Related Articles
The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old legislation pupil arrested lately through Kolkata Police on fees of injuring non secular sentiments and selling disharmony and hatred.
As her suggest approached the High Court, difficult the trial courtroom’s order final week sending her to judicial custody until June 13, the subject got here up for listening to sooner than the holiday bench of Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee.
However, Justice Chatterjee denied any aid to Panoli, staring at that the liberty of speech within the nation does no longer permit someone to harm someone’s non secular sentiment.
An FIR used to be registered in opposition to Panoli at Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 for posting an Instagram video, the place she made some feedback on ‘Operation Sindoor’ that had reportedly harm the non secular sentiments of a specific group.
In the face of robust complaint, she deleted that video and in addition tendered a public apology for the subject. However, in line with the FIR registered, the police first despatched her a realize, which failed since she had long gone into hiding in Gurugram through then.
Thereafter, an arrest warrant used to be issued in opposition to her, and in spite of everything, she used to be arrested from Gurugram through Kolkata Police on Saturday morning and used to be introduced again to Kolkata on transit remand at the identical day.
Rejecting the ad-interim bail, Justice Chatterjee noticed that the video posted on social media had reportedly harm the non secular sentiments of a piece of other people. “We have freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean you will go on to hurt others. Our country is diverse, with all people. We must be cautious,” he mentioned.
He directed the police to publish the case diary within the subject through the following date of listening to on June 5.
The holiday bench additionally directed the state govt to make sure that police don’t pursue another criticism filed in opposition to Panoli in another police station. It additionally directed the police to not sign up any contemporary court cases in the similar subject.
