Erin Patterson mushroom homicide trial LIVE updates: Patterson unearths messages she ‘regrets’ sending about lunch visitors – in 2d day of move exam

Patterson is once more reminded concerning the dialog she had with Simon on the Monash Medical Centre the place he mentioned, ‘is that the way you poisoned my folks the use of that dehydrator’.

The dialog came about after Patterson realized folks were getting remedy for dying cap posioning.

Dr Rogers took Patterson to her earlier solutions.

Patterson was once reminded that she mentioned she dried foraged mushrooms within the dehydrator weeks previous and put them right into a jar.

‘And I simply were given truly scared,’ she mentioned on the time.

‘Frantic,’ Patterson mentioned upon arriving house.

Patterson agreed that was once her proof.

Dr Rogers urged Patterson (pictured) lied to Simon about her clinical problems as a result of she sought after him on the lunch to ‘poison him’.

‘No, that isn’t true,’ Patterson mentioned.

Dr Rogers urged Patterson made a toxic pork Wellington for Simon ‘in case he became up’.

‘No, that isn’t true,’ Patterson mentioned.

Dr Rogers urged when Simon did not display on the lunch she dumped his pork Wellington.

Patterson instructed the jury she put the pastry and mushrooms within the bin.

Dr Rogers has constantly requested Patterson if she approached Simon after a church carrier on July 16, 2023 and mentioned she had some ‘essential clinical information’ that she sought after recommendation on and the way she would damage that to the children.

‘I disagree,’ Patterson mentioned.

Patterson additionally disputed that she discussed she sought after lend a hand in tips on how to damage it to the children.

‘That wasn’t the aim of the lunch or the aim of the invitation,’ she mentioned.

Dr Rogers once more mentioned Simon mentioned in his proof that he claimed Patterson sought after recommendation at the youngsters.

‘He did say that however I didn’t say that to him,’ she mentioned.

‘I did invite him to lunch.’

Dr Rogers mentioned Simon mentioned in his proof that Patterson was once willing for the children to not be there.

‘I didn’t (say that to him),’ Patterson mentioned

Dr Rogers mentioned Simon may have approved the lunch invite if his folks and the Wilkinsons attended.

‘I disagree with that,’ the accused mentioned.

Patterson additionally mentioned she mentioned Simon was once imply however by no means mentioned he was once ‘nasty’.

‘Yeah I feel I did say that,’ Patterson mentioned.

Dr Rogers requested Patterson if she instructed kid welfare officer Katrina Cripps ‘Simon was nasty’ after she claimed kid give a boost to.

‘Yeah I feel I did say that, yep,’ the accused mentioned.

Patterson was once additionally proven a message she despatched to Facebook buddy Christine Hunt the place she mentioned Simon was once ‘coercive’ and so they ‘disagreed so much’.

Dr Rogers (pictured) additionally requested Patterson if she posted on-line that ‘Simon was once now not a just right father’.

Dr Rogers reminded Patterson that her Facebook buddy and witness Danni Barkley mentioned she posted ‘Simon wasn’t a pleasing individual’.

‘I indubitably mentioned my courting with Simon within the chat workforce,’ Patterson mentioned.

‘I do not have in mind announcing he wasn’t a pleasing individual.

‘I may have mentioned that during a non-public chat workforce, I have no idea.’

Patterson mentioned it was once true she mentioned Simon’s cleanliness with Ms Barkley.

‘Yeah it’s true as a result of I spent two weeks cleansing his area at one level,’ she mentioned.

Patterson additionally admitted she did not need the children staying at Simon’s area.

Patterson additionally wrote a message wherein she referred to Simon as a ‘deadbeat’.

Dr Rogers urged Patterson was once ‘unsatisfied’.

‘I have no idea if I used to be satisfied or unsatisfied… I used to be annoyed I feel,’ Patterson mentioned.

‘I do not believe harm is mirrored on this message, I used to be annoyed.

‘I used to be harm about numerous issues, yeah I used to be,’ she mentioned.

Patterson is proven a message she wrote to her Facebook pals on December 7, 2022, the place she mentioned that if Simon sought after to stroll clear of his duties, then it is ‘a blessing in cover’.

Patterson could also be reminded of the ‘this circle of relatives I swear to f***ing God’ message.

Dr Rogers urged to Patterson this ‘expressed your true emotions’.

Patterson was once additionally reminded of the ‘f*** them’ message.

‘That’s what you considered Don, “f*** them”,’ Dr Rogers mentioned.

‘I remorseful about writing that,’ Patterson mentioned.

Dr Rogers additionally urged Patterson was once indignant at Don and Gail (pictured) for now not taking her aspect over Simon’s.

‘I wasn’t indignant however I used to be annoyed and harm,’ she mentioned.

Patterson mentioned she wasn’t indignant when she wrote the ‘f*** them’ message.

Patterson additionally denied she was once indignant when she wrote the ones messages to her Facebook pals.

Patterson was once grilled about transferring her youngsters to another college with out telling Simon (pictured).

Patterson mentioned she instructed Simon in March 2023.

‘In my area. He was once shedding our daughter off … and we invited him into the home and instructed him,’ she mentioned.

Dr Rogers mentioned Simon claimed they might had ‘no severe dialog’ about transferring colleges.

‘My reminiscence is the context of what he mentioned there was once whether or not we mentioned it in 2021, 2022,’ Patterson mentioned.

Dr Rogers urged to Patteron that she ‘simply moved’ the children.

‘I did transfer them… however I instructed Simon in March,’ the accused answered.

‘That’s now not true… you felt entitled to switch colleges,’ Dr Rogers mentioned.

Dr Rogers requested Patterson if the dispute about charges and kid give a boost to had vanished by the point she requested Simon to appear after her goat whilst she was once in New Zealand in December 2022.

‘I do not believe it had totally disappeared no, but it surely had by way of some weeks later,’ she mentioned.

Patterson, who’s these days dressed in a black most sensible with white polka dots, was once once more requested by way of Dr Rogers a few sequence of Signal messages between herself, Simon, Don and Gail.

In the messages, the topic of paying the child’s college charges was once mentioned.

Patterson was once requested to learn a Signal message she despatched Don and Gail to the court docket.

She discussed she would possibly wish to get a court docket order to switch the colleges.

Patterson agreed the varsity charges was once a large issue within the message.

‘I sought after them to lend a hand mediate the conversation between us,’ Patterson mentioned.

Patterson disagreed she requested Don and Gail to lend a hand her get Simon to pay part the varsity charges.

Dr Rogers stored suggesting that Don ‘refused to become involved’ which Patterson agreed.

Dr Rogers additionally urged Patterson was once indignant that Don did not wish to be concerned however she disagreed.

On Thursday, Dr Rogers discussed a photograph which fungi professional Dr Tom May with a bit of luck mentioned depicted dying cap mushrooms.

‘I do not believe they’re,’ Patterson answered.

Dr Rogers additionally urged Patterson noticed a submit on plant identity website online iNaturalist of a dying cap sighting at Loch made by way of Christine Mckenzie on April 18, 2023.

‘I disagree,’ Patterson mentioned.

‘I counsel then you went to Loch on April 28,’ Dr Rogers mentioned.

‘I have no idea if I did move to Loch on that day or now not,’ Patterson answered.

‘I counsel you went to Loch on that day to search out dying cap mushrooms,’ Dr Rogers mentioned.

‘I disagree,’ Patterson mentioned.

Dr Rogers then confirmed Patterson a photograph she urged had been dying cap mushrooms picked from Loch.

The Crown prosecutor additionally urged Patterson weighed dying cap mushrooms to ‘calculate the burden to manage the deadly dose required for one individual’.

Dr Rogers additionally urged Patterson weighed dying caps to calculate how a lot was once had to kill 5 folks.

Patterson mentioned she disagreed.

In what was not anything wanting a heated change, Dr Rogers (pictured) bombarded Patterson with questions suggesting she instructed repeated lies about having most cancers in the day before today’s court docket lawsuits.

‘You instructed this lie, I counsel, as a part of your efforts to get the lunch visitors, and Simon, to wait your lunch, right kind or flawed?’ Dr Rogers requested.

‘Incorrect,’ got here the reaction.

‘I counsel that you just by no means concept you would need to account for this lie about having most cancers since you concept that the lunch visitors would die?’ Dr Rogers mentioned.

‘That’s now not true,’ Patterson answered.

‘And your lie would by no means be discovered, right kind or flawed?’ Dr Rogers requested.

‘That’s now not true,’ Patterson insisted.

The jury had heard proof within the opening days of the trial from Pastor Ian Wilkinson (pictured), who was once the one individual to continue to exist the fatal lunch.

Mr Wilkinson claimed Patterson instructed lunch visitors she had undertaken a diagnostic take a look at that confirmed a place at the scan that was once a tumour.

‘I have in mind him announcing that during his proof, however I do not consider I mentioned that,’ Patterson mentioned.

‘Might you’ve mentioned it?’ Dr Nanette Rogers requested.

‘I do not believe so, no,’ Patterson mentioned.

Slowly loss of life at Korumburra Hospital after the lunch, the court docket heard Don Patterson additionally claimed Patterson discussed she were recognized with ovarian most cancers.

The court docket heard Don had instructed his son Simon: ‘Mum does not need me to let you know this. It’s about what Erin talked to us about on the lunch.’

More crowds (pictured on Friday) have braved the cold climate to show as much as see Erin Patterson within the witness field for the 5th immediately day.

Patterson is recently beneath cross-examination by way of lead Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC.

Patterson has been a large drawcard with folks queuing up out of doors the courthouse very early every morning to get a entrance row seat within the homicide trial.

Patterson, 50, is accused of murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, after allegedly serving them a pork Wellington lunch made with dying cap mushrooms.

Patterson could also be accused of making an attempt to homicide Heather’s husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, who survived the lunch after spending a number of weeks in an in depth care unit.

The court docket heard Patterson’s estranged husband, Simon, was once additionally invited to the collection at her house in Leongatha, in Victoria’s Gippsland area, however did not attend.

Witnesses instructed the jury Patterson ate her serving from a smaller, differently-coloured plate than the ones of her visitors, who ate off 4 gray plates.

Patterson instructed government she purchased dried mushrooms from an unnamed Asian retailer within the Monash house of Melbourne, however well being inspectors may just to find no proof of this.

On Thursday, Justice Christopher Beale instructed the jury it was once imaginable the trial would possibly move on for every other couple of weeks.

It’s most probably Patterson will likely be within the witness field all week and perhaps subsequent week too, the jury was once instructed

Justice Beale mentioned as soon as proof is finished, he’s going to have prison discussions with the events whilst the jury is out, prior to last addresses can begin.