BBC News
BBC News, Essex

The usual price for automobile drivers the usage of the Dartford Crossing will upward thrust from £2.50 to £3.50 in September.
The crossing hyperlinks the M25 in Essex and Kent.
Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood, in a observation to Parliament, mentioned the street was once utilized by as many as 180,000 cars every day and the present price was once “no longer sufficient” to control call for.
Jen Craft, the MP for within reach Thurrock, mentioned she was once “disappointed” and would write to her Labour colleague Greenwood to invite her to “reconsider”.
Conservative Richard Holden described the federal government announcement as “underhanded” and fellow Essex MP James McMurdock, of Reform UK, mentioned it was once standard of “rip-off Britain”.

Greenwood mentioned there can be “significant” reductions for folks residing in the neighborhood and that automobile drivers with pre-pay accounts would pay £2.80 for every crossing.
People riding buses, coaches, trucks and different items cars with two axles would pay as much as £4.20 below the adjustments.
Vehicles with greater than two axles can be charged as much as £8.40.
The charges have been closing higher in 2014.
Greenwood mentioned the brand new fees have been “significantly lower” than if they’d higher consistent with inflation since 2014.
“I am aware that these necessary changes to the charges will be unwelcome news for users of the crossing,” she mentioned.
“These traffic levels are well in excess of the crossing’s design capacity, causing delays for drivers.”
‘Another tax’
Under the unique building scheme for the Queen Elizabeth II Bridge (which opened in 1991), tolls have been supposed to forestall when the non-public finance initiative contract with Dartford River Crossing Limited resulted in 2003.
However, the Transport Act 2000 had presented charging schemes for all trunk roads, bridges and tunnels that spanned greater than 600m (1,969feet), which allowed the Highways Agency to proceed to price a crossing price.
Labour MP Craft mentioned she continuously used the crossing herself.
“I will be writing to the roads minister to ask if there’s any scope to reconsider it, also asking if there’s any scope for retaining some of the money that’s raised to fund local public transport,” she mentioned.
However, she mentioned she may see the “logic” at the back of expanding the charges.
Holden, the Tory MP for Basildon and Billericay, branded the rise as “just another tax on motorists” for drivers who had “no other option” however to make use of the crossing.
“I do not understand how that is possibly justifiable at the moment, and if the minster wants to try and justify that they should have the backbone to do it on the floor of the House of Commons where they can be questioned on it,” he mentioned.
McMurdock, the MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock, mentioned: “The toll was supposed to be removed once the costs of building the bridge had been repaid. What a joke.
“How will making it dearer to move the Thames ship the expansion [that government] promised, and our country desperately wishes?”
Jim Dickson, the Labour MP for Dartford, said the price rise was “unwelcome” but said he was glad ministers had “listened to me” by ensuring Dartford residents would still receive a “vital cut price” for their annual passes.
“It’s necessary that we do not see large worth rises within the close to long term, and I’ll stay combating to verify native persons are handled quite,” he continued.
This week, it was announced that the Treasury would give £590m to the Lower Thames Crossing – a new tunnel under the estuary – which would link Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent.
National Highways hopes the brand new highway will scale back visitors on the Dartford Crossing via 20%.