At the judging consultation for The Drum Awards for Marketing US, held 63 flooring above Manhattan in Stagwell’s World Trade Center HQ, a trio of trade leaders got here to a stunning conclusion: information – lengthy blamed for the dying of creativity – may simply be the object that brings humanity again to advertising.
“Let’s stop focusing on the risks of AI,” stated Michael Treff, CEO of Code and Theory, who as a Stagwell company used to be website hosting the development, “And start focusing on the opportunities.”
It used to be a pointy flip clear of the standard narratives of automation panic and machine-driven blandness. But Treff’s level, echoed by means of his fellow panellists – Victoria Lozano, CMO of Crayola, and Jonathan Harrop, VP of selling and comms for wholesale buying and selling at Citi (talking in a private capability) – used to be this: used correctly, information could make advertising extra human, no longer much less.
Rather than stripping the soul from campaigns, the fitting information can carry relevance, intimacy, even emotion – if entrepreneurs are courageous sufficient to make use of it that manner.
Rediscovering empathy thru AI
“We’ve all talked about ‘personalisation at scale’ for years,” Treff stated. “It was marketing bullshit. Now, it’s actually possible. We can finally stop wasting time on menial work and focus on what matters: insight, strategy, breakthrough ideas.”
But that’s provided that advertising evolves. The panel argued that the normal silos – advertising, tech, information – are now not are compatible for function.
Treff, whose company operates on the intersection of creativity and code, believes we’re coming into the age of the full-stack marketer – a brand new breed of ability in a position to transport throughout technique, tooling, inventive, or even gentle engineering. “The old departmental divisions are collapsing. And the same is happening at the C-suite level. The most successful transformations are happening horizontally, across leadership functions, not in isolation.”
Harrop agreed, noting that recognize for each and every different’s craft – specifically between entrepreneurs and tech groups – results in more potent results. “If you understand what you’re asking for, you get better work. You can set realistic expectations. You stop being the CMO who asks for a website tomorrow and wonders why people groan.”
Want to head deeper? Ask The Drum
Creativity underneath force
The thought of empathy got here up over and over – no longer only for audiences, however for groups navigating more and more advanced environments.
Lozano described a “tale of two cities” inside of Crayola’s advertising division. “Some teams are already using AI and new platforms with a high degree of sophistication. Others don’t know where to begin. Bridging that gap is hard. There’s no one-size-fits-all approach.”
Instead, she argued, entrepreneurs wish to steadiness secure fingers with daring pondering. “You can’t panic. You can’t overcorrect. But you also can’t keep doing things the way they’ve always been done.”
For Harrop, ongoing studying is non-negotiable – particularly as new tech strikes quicker than many younger hires can stay alongside of. “There was this assumption that because someone’s young, they get tech. That’s not true anymore. You need to create space for internal pilots and experimentation. You need to back curiosity.”
Don’t concern the knowledge – concern the unfairness
There used to be additionally a caution: information is best as excellent because the people decoding it.
Gayle Troberman from iHeartMedia, talking from the target market, gave a pointy reminder that information can toughen bias as simply as it will possibly disclose fact. “We did a study with Malcolm Gladwell and found that most Americans still don’t know what an NFT is – but every marketer does. That’s bias. We use data to justify anything. But if you’re out of touch with the real world, you’ll make bad decisions, even if they’re data-informed.”
Harrop agreed: “In financial marketing, we’re using data to push behaviour – nudging people to redeem points for gift cards instead of cash, because it’s better for the company. But if we’re not careful, it becomes a manipulation tool. We have to think about what we’re actually trying to achieve.”
Treff took it additional. “The problem with performance marketing is it’s been a race to the bottom. Optimise, optimise, optimise – but to what end? If we flip that, data should let us build real emotional connections. It should give us more context, more nuance, more humanity.”
What the judges need now
As the jury ready to guage the entries, they have been united in something: enjoying it protected received’t lower it.
“We’re here to inspire, not reward yesterday’s playbook,” stated Harrop. “Look for ambition – even if it didn’t work.”
“I want big creative ideas,” stated Lozano. “Something fresh – whether it’s in the concept or the execution. Something that shakes up a tired category.”
Treff added: “Look for work that’s curious. That tries to meet people in new ways. Even the mistakes might point us to the future.”
The upward push of human advertising
This 12 months’s CEO judging consultation will have taken position in a tech-driven company at the 63rd ground of a New York skyscraper, but it surely felt grounded in one thing deeply human. Emotion. Judgement. Curiosity. Empathy.
The age of information doesn’t imply the top of creativity. On the opposite – if entrepreneurs are daring sufficient to make use of it smartly, it would simply be the object that is helping us really feel once more.
As Treff put it: “If you’re not excited to be part of a creative, tech-driven industry in 2025 – you’re probably in the wrong profession.”