Which Canon Wide Angle Zoom Lens Is Right for You?

Finding the suitable broad attitude lens is significant in case you are taking pictures genuine property, landscapes, and even vlogging. Here’s a have a look at two well-liked choices from Canon.

Coming to you from Josh Sattin, this sensible video places the Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM thru its paces, trying out it in a real skilled shoot and immediately evaluating it with the costlier RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM. Sattin showcases the lens’ sharpness and general symbol high quality by way of presenting clips from a real genuine property challenge. While the RF 16-28mm delivers sharp, blank pictures appropriate for pro use, he highlights some notable obstacles. For example, he discusses the narrower zoom vary, declaring that 16mm is not moderately as flexible as the wider 15mm present in competing lenses, one thing that turns into in particular related when photographing interiors.

Sattin then carefully compares stabilization options, appearing real-world clips as an example variations obviously. He walks audience thru each hand held vlogging and static taking pictures situations, emphasizing the digital camera’s integrated stabilization (IBIS) paired with the lens’ stabilization features. Interestingly, in spite of other value issues, the stabilization effects between the RF 16-28mm and RF 15-35mm are remarkably an identical. He does, alternatively, warning about standard nook wobble problems inherent with broad lenses on Canon mirrorless cameras, advising how you can mitigate this by way of adjusting virtual stabilization settings.

An necessary attention is autofocus reliability. By acting managed autofocus checks, Sattin finds that the RF 15-35mm is rather extra responsive and correct in comparison to the RF 16-28mm, noting noticeable focal point respiring with the latter lens. However, he issues out Canon’s integrated focal point respiring correction, which in large part solves this factor in case your digital camera helps it, even though at the price of a minor crop.

Beyond technical main points, Sattin stocks non-public insights won from years the usage of the RF 15-35mm. He describes refined but significant variations in symbol high quality, suggesting the RF 15-35mm produces pictures with richer colour, enhanced distinction, and extra interesting lens flares. The RF 16-28mm, by way of comparability, controls flares exceptionally smartly, which would possibly or won’t fit your taste relying on whether or not you like a blank or extra inventive aesthetic.

Physically, the RF 16-28mm has distinct benefits for sure situations like commute, mountain climbing, or gimbal paintings. Sattin explains how its compact measurement and light-weight construct (simply over a pound) make it considerably more uncomplicated to take care of in comparison to the bulkier RF 15-35mm. However, he additionally issues out the compromises—most commonly plastic building, absence of an integrated lens hood, and a novel locking mechanism that calls for adjusting the zoom ring prior to taking pictures.

Financially, the RF 16-28mm provides a gorgeous price at round $1,150 new. In comparability, the RF 15-35mm, whilst awesome in general construct and symbol high quality, retails round $2,300 new (even though less expensive used choices exist). Sattin in short suggests every other choice—the RF 14-35mm f/4—for the ones in need of a good broader vary and lighter weight than the RF 15-35mm however desiring to stability price and aperture. Check out the video above for the entire rundown from Sattin.