Justin Baldoni’s legal professionals have withdrawn a subpoena that used to be issued to Taylor Swift amid the It Ends With Us actor’s ongoing criminal fight with co-star Blake Lively.
Swift, who’s shut pals with Lively, have been discussed in reference to the continued criminal case between the co-stars when textual content exchanges had been published that integrated her title in Baldoni’s US$400-million defamation countersuit in opposition to Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds in January.
Lawyers for Swift and Lively in the past filed motions to revoke the subpoena, issued previous this month.
Lively’s spokesperson in the past stated that Baldoni had tried to subpoena the pop superstar as a witness within the case “designed” to make use of Swift’s “name to draw public interest.”
“We are pleased that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties have withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her law firm,” the spokesperson stated in a observation to Variety on May 22.
“We supported the efforts of Taylor’s team to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel and we will continue to stand up for any third party who is unjustly harassed or threatened in the process.”
“The Baldoni and Wayfarer team have tried to put Taylor Swift, a woman who has been an inspiration for tens of millions across the globe, at the center of this case since day one,” Lively’s spokesperson added.
“Faced with having to justify themselves in federal court, they folded. At some point they will run out of distractions from the actual claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they are facing,” the observation concluded.

Since the criminal fight started, Baldoni’s criminal staff has made textual content messages from Lively and Reynolds public on a web page, titled The Lawsuit Info, created to lend a hand shield him.
On the web page, printed in early February, Baldoni, 41, additionally shared an amended grievance in his case in opposition to Lively, Reynolds, Lively’s PR company and the New York Times, in addition to a 168-page record, known as “Timeline of relevant events,” associated with the case and the manufacturing of the movie.

Get day by day National information
Get the day’s most sensible information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered on your inbox as soon as an afternoon.
The timeline comprises emails and textual content messages that had been allegedly despatched main as much as and right through the film’s filming.
Text messages between Lively and Baldoni, the place she reputedly alludes to Swift as “one of her dragons,” had been launched in February. Swift and Lively had been very shut pals since 2015 and the pop superstar is the godmother of Lively’s kids.
According to Variety, the subpoenas to Swift and her criminal staff didn’t seem to be hooked up to these explicit textual content messages.
Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s attorney, stated he used to be searching for proof that Lively’s attorney had threatened to unencumber textual content messages between Lively and Swift except Swift issued a observation of give a boost to for the Gossip Girl actor, in keeping with a court docket submitting considered via the hole. (Global News has now not independently considered the record.)
Freedman alleged that he gained a voicemail on Feb. 14 from “a person very closely linked to Taylor Swift.” He declined to spot the individual however claimed that Lively’s attorney had demanded that the 35-year-old singer put up a observation in give a boost to of Lively on social media and warned that he may just unencumber 10 years of textual content messages between the pair.
Freedman additionally claimed that Swift’s legal professionals accused Lively’s legal professionals of extortion.
The unidentified individual additionally claimed that Lively had advised Swift to delete their textual content messages from a number of months previous, in keeping with Freedman.
Freedman stated the subpoena used to be to acquire the allegedly extortionate dialog in a letter to Lively’s attorney.
Lively’s legal professionals known as Freedman’s allegations “unequivocally and demonstrably false.”
Swift’s criminal staff in the past stated that if Swift used to be subpoenaed, she wouldn’t have any data related to the criminal dispute and will have to now not be concerned within the case.
“Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was travelling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history,” her spokesperson stated on May 9.
Swift’s staff stated her simplest involvement within the movie used to be licensing a track, which used to be My Tears Ricochet.
“Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift’s name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case,” the spokesperson stated.
Lively’s criminal staff launched a observation after information of Swift’s attainable involvement within the case unfold. It stated that Baldoni and his criminal staff “continue to turn a case of sexual harassment and retaliation into entertainment for the tabloids.”
“This is a very serious legal matter, not Barnum & Bailey’s Circus,” the spokesperson stated. “The defendants continue to publicly intimidate, bully, shame and attack women’s rights and reputations.”
Baldoni and Lively’s criminal trial is about for March 2026 in New York City.
&reproduction 2025 Global News, a department of Corus Entertainment Inc.