Schools throughout Britain are paying 1000’s of kilos for AI instrument which academics can use to set pupils homework and provides them issues in line with their behaviour, MailOnline can disclose.
The government-approved instrument, known as Team Satchel, boasts that it’s ‘giving academics their weekends and evenings again’.
Its web site is plagued by prime scoring critiques, together with 3 from the similar instructor within the area of 4 months, and claims for use in a 3rd of secondary faculties in Britain.
Some secondary faculties might be forking out up to £27,000 to have the control data gadget for 3 years, in step with a pricing report.
As smartly as surroundings homework, personnel can provide or take issues clear of scholars relying on their behaviour the place they’re put on a digital ‘leaderboard’ for academics to view.
‘The skill to assign each sure and adverse issues to scholars, from the entrance of the category, approach reputation is well timed and helps sure reinforcements ,’ the web site reads.
But livid campaigners worry it’s going to result in ‘algorithm-based’ studying and mark the top of ‘inspirational’ educating.
The ‘AI revolution in the study room’ is being pushed via the Labour authorities which in March dedicated £45 million of taxpayers’ cash into beefing up web connectivity in faculties.
Naimish Gohil (pictured) is the founding father of Team Satchel and says he desires his tech company to turn into ‘synonymous with schooling’

Research performed via the National Literacy Trust discovered two in 5 academics had used generative AI in 2024 to create lesson content material
Chris McGovern, chair of Campaign for Real Education, instructed MailOnline the instrument would ‘supply employment coverage for lazy and incompetent academics’.
‘Reliance on AI will have some administrative benefits however it’s going to mark the top of inspirational educating,’ he mentioned.
‘Teaching will turn into algorithm-based and formulaic. It’s going to be “Goodbye, Mr. Chips” and “Hello, Mr Deadly-Dull Robot”.
‘The rising use of such instrument via faculties issues to a desolate, miserable and dehumanised revel in of studying for pupils.
‘Dangerously, it’s going to feed kids’s damaging habit to virtual generation at a time when they’re affected by a psychological well being disaster. Schools want to focal point as a lot on “Mind Change” as they do on “Climate Change“.
‘According to The Children’s Society we have already got the unhappiest kids in Europe. Schools will have to be encouraging youngsters to be much less reliant on virtual generation no longer strengthening its grip on them.’
Parenting team UsForThem has not too long ago introduced its Put The Brakes on EdTech marketing campaign, which calls on secondary faculties to droop the usage of pupil-facing generation.

Co-founder of parenting team UsForThem Molly Kingsley instructed MailOnline that ‘tech corresponding to this would possibly smartly save academics time however it is disingenuous to fake that it’s in pupils’ bests pursuits’

Retired headteacher Chris McGovern (pictured), chair of Campaign for Real Education, mentioned the instrument would ‘supply employment coverage for lazy and incompetent academics’
Co-founder Molly Kingsley instructed MailOnline that ‘tech corresponding to this would possibly smartly save academics time however it is disingenuous to fake that it’s in pupils’ bests pursuits’.
She mentioned: ‘The core goal of educating will have to be to inspire kids to suppose significantly and for themselves, however how can pupils be anticipated to do that if academics are actively warding off doing the similar?
‘The insertion of tech into the pupil-teacher dating additional erodes the bond between instructor and kid and springs at only a second that kids are disengaging from the varsity gadget in report numbers.
‘In addition, observe signifies that ed tech on the whole and AI enhanced ed tech specifically gifts an entire collection of considerations about information and privateness problems which faculties are in poor health supplied to maintain.
‘The overwhelming majority of oldsters would favor homework to be set via an concerned and engaged instructor the use of not anything extra refined than pen and paper.’
Team Satchel was once based in 2011 via vegetarian Naimish Gohil, a former assistant headteacher on the then named Henry Compton Boys School in London and instrument engineer.

Britain’s ‘strictest headteacher’ Katharine Birbalsingh (pictured in January 2023) has lengthy voiced opposition in opposition to the usage of AI in faculties
He instructed the Tech Talks podcast six years in the past he sought after his corporate to turn into ‘synonymous with schooling’.
‘Our process is to serve the varsity leaders and resolution makers to assist faculties, as a result of if we will assist them and supply them with answers to assist them run faculties higher then this is naturally going to cascade right down to academics, scholars, and fogeys,’ he mentioned.
James Bore, managing director of cybersecurity consultancy, Bores, has warned faculties about the use of AI in schooling.
He instructed MailOnline: ‘While everybody’s very serious about AI, I can’t pressure sufficient how necessary it’s to recognise that lots of the AI in the market has completely no working out.
‘It is, to simplify, the most important predictive autocorrect – a language engine. There is not any working out of that language, there’s no difference between fact and fiction.
‘AI, LLMs, could be a tough software, and may also be helpful, however they can’t be relied upon to be correct and so any use of them to teach will have to include safeguards and human fact-checking to keep away from hallucinations.’
The Department for Education mentioned AI would assist academics focal point on face-to-face educating reasonably than time spent on ‘burdensome marking and admin’.
But Britain’s ‘strictest headteacher’ Katharine Birbalsingh has lengthy voiced opposition in opposition to it.
The head of Michaela Community School in Brent, north London, warned in February it might ‘dumb down classes’.
The 52-year-old mentioned: ‘Your mind recollects stuff for those who write it down, for those who learn it.
‘The explanation why our youngsters are so literate and so articulate is as a result of they do a lot of studying and writing in the study room.

In a letter to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson (pictured), GMB nationwide officer Stacey Booth warned that its individuals had ‘expressed more than one considerations about the usage of genAI’ in faculties
‘If you might be on a display, you might be simply no longer going to be told as a lot and the trade of being on a display in fact dumbs you down, in order that is devastating for youngsters that come from tougher backgrounds.
‘We strongly advise our households to not give them smartphones in any respect, so clearly smartphones don’t seem to be allowed at school, however we in fact advise them simply to not give them smartphones in any respect.’
Research performed via the National Literacy Trust discovered two in 5 academics had used generative AI in 2024 to create lesson content material.
The upward thrust of AI led the GMB union this week to warn ministers that the generation was once ‘dehumanising’ faculties.
In a letter to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, the union’s nationwide officer Stacey Booth warned that its individuals had ‘expressed more than one considerations about the usage of genAI’.
This incorporated ‘dishonest and plagiarism, privateness, information safety and on-line protection to the lack of human contact in schooling’.
Ms Booth mentioned: ‘In specific, individuals’ considerations concerning the dehumanisation of sure spaces of schooling remind us that the rise of generation in faculties might result in a devaluing of the tangible sides of schooling, just like the social and emotional construction that faculties give a boost to, and the employees who do that.
‘This paintings will have to no longer be forgotten within the force to introduce new applied sciences and genAI into schooling.’
MailOnline has contacted Team Satchel for remark.