Political reporter

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has stated the federal government is having a look at scrapping the two-child receive advantages cap however warned it might “cost a lot of money”.
Speaking to the BBC, the minister stated the coverage – which prevents maximum households from claiming means-tested advantages for any 3rd or further kids born after April 2017 – had driven other folks into poverty.
However, she stated “seeking to unwind that and to change the social security system is not easy”, including that the cost tag can be giant.
The govt is anticipated to announce its resolution at the cap in autumn, when it publishes its baby poverty technique.
Phillipson, at the side of Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, is main the Child Poverty Taskforce placing in combination the method. It have been because of be revealed in spring however has now been not on time till the fall.
The taskforce was once introduced ultimate 12 months, at a time when the federal government was once being steered through the SNP and a few Labour MPs to scrap the cap.
Pressure from Labour backbenchers over the problem – in addition to cuts to welfare – have intensified for the reason that Labour’s deficient efficiency on the native elections previous this 12 months.
In its manifesto on the 2024 election, Labour stated it might eliminate the cap “when fiscal conditions allow”.
Phillipson informed the BBC the taskforce was once having a look on the cap and “nothing is off the table”.
She stated a Labour govt would by no means have presented the cap, including: “Labour governments make different choices, we have different priorities, and you will see that coming through later this year.”
Although she emphasized the price of casting off the cap can be prime, she added that the “cost of inaction” could also be extremely prime as a result of this scars the lifestyles probabilities of kids on this nation”.
In a speech on Monday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is expected to promise to abolish the cap if his party gets into government.
Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride defended the policy, which was introduced by his party in 2017.
“A large number of other folks up and down the rustic undergo the ones onerous possible choices and regularly sacrifices, with a purpose to have a big circle of relatives,” he told the BBC.
“I do not believe it is unreasonable beneath the ones cases to have a cap on the two-child stage for many who would in a different way be depending on advantages for additional kids.”
The Liberal Democrats and the Green Party both committed to getting rid of the cap in their election manifestos.
Liberal Democrat Treasury spokeswoman Daisy Cooper said: “Dangling hope in entrance of determined folks is inexcusable. Continuing to punish kids only for being born is unforgivable.
“The public is fed up of a government failing to deliver change – Labour needs to learn to U-turn faster.”
Around 1.6 million kids reside in a family suffering from the cap, in keeping with statistics from the Department of Work and Pensions.
The Resolution Foundation suppose tank says axing the coverage would value £3.5bn and would elevate 470,000 kids out of poverty.