Global News Post Fastest Global News Portal
Related Articles
John McDonnell obviously takes accountability, along side Jeremy Corbyn, for the “policy platform” they advanced in combination within the hope that “eventually Labour would return to power” (Starmer and co are trashing Labour’s legacy. We should take again keep an eye on of our celebration – sooner than it’s too overdue, 28 May). Throughout his article, McDonnell argues for an alternate way to that being adopted by means of the present top minister, Keir Starmer.
At no degree does he recognize that, when status in this Corbyn/McDonnell coverage platform, Labour misplaced two basic elections. By shedding those elections they condemned this nation to seven years of Tory rule – seven years right through which the Tories wreaked havoc. Yet I notice that now not as soon as in his piece does McDonnell be offering any more or less apology for those years of mayhem.
Starmer is a minimum of making an attempt to position this proper. He modified the celebration’s insurance policies with a purpose to make it extra electable, and he used to be (fortunately) a success. Now let him get on and end the activity. Passing “control” again to McDonnell and his sidekicks will simply ship Labour again into the barren region.
Shaun Soper
Midhurst, West Sussex
John McDonnell has recognized Labour’s malaise, which, he reminds us, impacts now not simply its individuals in No 10 (hubris) however all the motion (disillusionment). Almost a yr in the past seven MPs – together with him – had been suspended after they voted towards keeping up the two-child cap on advantages, and after Labour’s fresh U-turn we will most effective glance ahead, in hope, to their reinstatement. But, as he warns us, we are facing a looming disaster.
He is correct to characterise how Labour is governing as “timid”. Its tone-deaf acceptance of company gifting used to be brushed aside as trivial sniping by means of the left. Try mentioning that as an excuse when making an attempt to retain enhance at the doorstep and being met with “they’re all the same” whilst the ones determined for trade glance over your shoulder at Reform.
The choice of MPs who vote with the federal government, or abstain, when it makes an attempt to chop disabled other folks’s advantages might be a measure of ways deeply ill the celebration has turn out to be.
Dr Peter Mangan
Beckenham, Kent
John McDonnell’s grievance of the Labour govt could be tune to the receptive ears of other folks annoyed by means of a loss of development on many problems of shock to these within the labour motion and past in those nonetheless early days of Starmer’s govt.
I’m reminded of the early years of Tony Blair’s govt, right through which such a lot of felt annoyed with development. But take a look at how that modified and bore fruit, to the level that by means of 2010 Labour used to be deemed an overspending, reckless, leftish govt.
In 2010, within the canine days of Gordon Brown’s tenure, I recall sharing a platform with John McDonnell, who castigated Brown as a rightwing monetarist who had failed the labour motion and the folk. What we might all give to have the ones ranges of social spending now.
Trevor Hopper
Lewes, East Sussex
Like John McDonnell, I’m in my 70s, a lifelong Labour voter, and I’ve been a member of the celebration for greater than 40 years. I’d simply notice that each and every Labour govt in my lifetime, together with the nice Attlee govt, has been accused of betrayal and forsaking ideas, principally by means of individuals who declare to be at the left. I’d additionally notice that, in spite of the criticisms, it’s Labour governments that experience delivered virtually each and every social advance and financial growth within the lives of extraordinary British citizens over the ones greater than seven many years.
Alex Gallagher
Largs, North Ayrshire
Bridget Phillipson says it’s the ethical project “of this Labour government to ensure that fewer children grow up in poverty” (Report, 27 May). What’s with “fewer”? Shouldn’t it’s that no youngsters develop up in poverty, or am I lacking one thing?
Simon Lauris Hudson
Pontefract, West Yorkshire
