Business secretary says critics of UK-India industry deal ‘confused’ and ‘British workers are not being undercut’ – UK politics are living

Good morning. Yesterday the federal government used to be ready to announce some excellent information – a significant industry take care of India.

There is cross-party consensus that industry offers are a excellent factor, the remaining Conservative govt used to be operating on a industry take care of India too, and no less than some Tories had been satisfied to welcome the deal. Oliver Dowden, the previous deputy PM, posted this on social media.

Welcome development with conclusion of UK-India FTA. I keep in mind firsthand Jonathan Reynolds’s dedication to the connection from our cross-party delegation to India!

Builds on important development made by way of earlier Conservative govt.

Free industry is a win-win for each countries

And Jacob Rees-Mogg, the previous industry secretary who’s at the reverse wing of the occasion to Dowden, posted this.

Cheaper foods and drinks together with rice and tea, shoes and clothes because of a welcome industry take care of India. Exactly what Brexit promised.

But Dowden and Rees-Mogg didn’t get the memo concerning the professional opposition line. As reported at the weblog the day past afternoon, Kemi Badenoch made up our minds to assault the deal at the grounds that it features a double contribution conference, which means that that Indian staff briefly dwelling in the United Kingdom is not going to need to pay nationwide insurance coverage contributions for 3 years – with British staff in India reaping benefits in the similar means. Crucially, Badenoch discovered an efficient way of hanging a detrimental spin in this fairly area of interest function of the deal – she described it as “two-tier” taxation, involving “tax refunds for Indians not available to us”. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK chief, used to be temporarily making the similar argument too, claiming the federal government used to be making it 20% less expensive to make use of an Indian employee than a British employee. In a video he stated the deal used to be “appalling”, and claimed it confirmed Labour had “in a big, big way betrayed working Britain”.

Badenoch has indisputably been a success at touchdown her message with the rightwing papers. Here are a few of lately’s entrance pages.

Jonathan Reynolds, the industry secretary, has been giving interviews this morning. His major process used to be to counter the Tory/Reform UK claims and he insisted that double contribution conventions had been a regimen function of industry offers, making use of to only a sub-category of staff (workers from corporations with operations in each the United Kingdom and India, seconded briefly from one nation to some other), and that the British staff weren’t being undercut. The Tories and Reform UK had been “confused”, he stated.

He informed the Today programme:

There is not any state of affairs the place I’d ever tolerate British staff being undercut via any industry settlement we might signal. That isn’t a part of this deal.

What the Conservatives are at a loss for words about, and Reform as smartly, is a state of affairs the place a industry in India seconds somebody for a brief time frame to the United Kingdom, or a UK industry seconds a employee to India for a brief time frame, the place you don’t pay in concurrently now to each social safety methods …

This is strictly this type of deal we have now with 50 nations already, with america, Canada, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand.

The Conservatives just lately, smartly a couple of years in the past after they had been in govt, signed one with Chile for 5 years. So no, British staff aren’t being undercut.

Asked whether or not the settlement intended Indian staff paying much less tax than British opposite numbers doing the similar process, Reynolds informed the programme: “No.”

In an interview with Sky News, Reynolds stated that the industry deal would generate greater than £1bn in additional tax revenues for the Treasury. He stated the double contribution conference would price “less than a tenth of that”.

Here is the time table for the day.

8.30am: Rhun ap Iorwerth, the Plaid Cymru chief, offers a speech in Cardiff marking 12 months to move till the following Senedd elections.

9.45am: Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, offers a speech to the CyberUK convention in Manchester.

10.30am: John Swinney, Scotland’s first minister, offers a speech in Edinburgh on SNP technique operating into subsequent yr’s Holyrood elections. Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour chief, may be giving a speech this morning, at 10.45am, as is the Scottish Consevative chief, Russel Findley, at 12.30pm.

10.55am: Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, attends a ‘Turning of the Page Ceremony’ within the Commons, with the e-book of remembrance naming MPs killed in each international wars, as a part of the VE Day 80th anniversary celebrations.

Noon: Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs.

Lunchtime: Rachel Reeves, the chancellor is visiting a Scotch whisky distillery close to Edinburgh to advertise the UK-India industry deal (which cuts price lists on whisky exports to India).

2.30pm: Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister, offers proof to an inflamed blood inquiry listening to about reimbursement cost preparations.

If you wish to have to touch me, please put up a message under the road when feedback are open (most often between 10am and 3pm nowadays), or message me on social media. I will’t learn the entire messages BTL, however when you put “Andrew” in a message aimed toward me, I’m much more likely to peer it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase.

If you wish to have to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of social media. You can achieve me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its professional accounts on X however particular person Guardian newshounds are there, I nonetheless have my account, and when you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I can see it and reply if essential.

I in finding it very useful when readers indicate errors, even minor typos. No error is just too small to proper. And I in finding your questions very attention-grabbing too. I will’t promise to respond to all of them, however I can check out to respond to as many as I will, both BTL or occasionally within the weblog.