The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Friday introduced a scathing assault on Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of constructing “careless” statements over his repeated questions in regards to the ‘losses’ all the way through Operation Sindoor and the federal government’s silence on former U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims that his management brokered a truce between India and Pakistan.
While addressing a press convention at BHP headquarters, BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia mentioned that the Indian Army is being praised around the nation and all electorate are status with them however the Congress leaders, together with Rahul Gandhi, in finding laborious to consider within the Army’s motion and nation’s get to the bottom of to tackle terror.
“Every citizen is happy with the Armed Forces and is standing with them. But Rahul Gandhi continues to make careless statements. Today, the country is asking Rahul Gandhi about his abusive language against the Prime Minister. Your statements are being supported in Pakistan, also the statements of Congress leaders are being used by Pakistani Parliament to defame India,” he mentioned, IANS reported.
He additional alleged that Gandhi must come to a decision whether or not he’s the Leader of the Opposition in India or a recipient of the Nishan-e-Pakistan from Pakistan.
Bhatia added “Rahul Gandhi should decide which side he is on? Are you the leader of the opposition (LoP) of India or the Nishan-e-Pakistan of Pakistan?”
Earlier, Lok Sabha LoP had puzzled External Affairs Minister Jaishankar on social media X and accused him of being.
“EAM Jaishankar’s silence isn’t just telling — it’s damning. So I’ll ask again: How many Indian aircraft did we lose because Pakistan knew? This wasn’t a lapse. It was a crime. And the nation deserves the truth,” Rahul Gandhi mentioned.
As in line with the ANI, Rahul Gandhi had additionally shared a video of EAM Jaishankar of May 17 wherein he mentioned that “At the start of the operation we have sent a message to Pakistan saying we are striking at infrastructure and we are not striking at the military, so military has the option of standing out and not interfering in this process. They chose not to take good advice.”