Home / World / Trump stated he may prevent the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. After 100 days, a deal nonetheless eludes him
Trump stated he may prevent the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. After 100 days, a deal nonetheless eludes him

Trump stated he may prevent the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. After 100 days, a deal nonetheless eludes him

U.S President Donald Trump speaks to participants of press onboard Air Force One on a flight to Fiumicino Airport close to Rome to wait the funeral of Pope Francis, April 25, 2025.

Nathan Howard | Reuters

Before his presidential election win final fall, Donald Trump famously boasted that he may finish the conflict between Russia and Ukraine in “one day.”

During the primary tone-setting 100 days of Trump’s 2d presidency, achieving a ceasefire settlement that is revered through each side — let on my own a peace deal — has arguably been a lot more difficult than the White House chief had expected.

Trump has rowed again on his preliminary feedback about bringing a handy guide a rough finish to the three-year struggle.

“Well, I said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, because to make a point,” Trump informed Time mag final week. “Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that [the war] will be ended.”

To be truthful to the Trump management, it did not waste time in beginning discussions with Russia, after which with Ukraine, in a bid to dealer a ceasefire deal that might result in peace talks. As but, there was no actual growth on that rating.

Talks are ongoing between the U.S. and groups from Kyiv and Moscow, however Washington threatened final week to surrender negotiations if there was once no approaching indicators of compromise. The combatants have persisted to accuse every different of sabotaging a ceasefire deal and of no longer respecting a U.S.-brokered settlement not to goal their respective power infrastructure.

‘Very vital’ week forward

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated Sunday that the approaching week shall be “very critical” for the White House because it makes a “determination about whether this [ceasefire talks] is an endeavor that we want to continue to be involved in.”

“There are reasons to be optimistic, but there are reasons to be realistic,” Rubio stated, including: “We’re close, but we’re not close enough.”

Russia and Ukraine proceed to business drone and missile assaults whilst retaining separate talks with the U.S. Kyiv’s hopes to revive its pre-war territorial sovereignty took successful final week, when the U.S. looked as if it would facet with Russia that Ukraine would possibly have to just accept the lack of occupied territory, similar to Crimea, as a part of a peace deal.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin insists it’s eager about a peace deal, with Spokesman Dmitry Peskov telling journalists Monday that whilst Russia’s conflict on Ukraine carries on, so do efforts through the U.S. “to bring the process on a peaceful path.”

“The readiness of the Russian side has been repeatedly confirmed by the president [Vladimir Putin], the readiness of the Russian side without any preliminary conditions to begin the negotiation process with Ukraine in order to get on peaceful path. The efforts are continuing. That is all we can say on that,” he stated, consistent with feedback translated through NBC News.

Tina Fordham, founding father of Fordham Global Foresight, famous that that, whilst the week forward was once being framed as every other “make or break” duration for international relations at the Russia-Ukraine struggle, she did not see grounds for optimism on a solution to the conflict.

“It’s easy to start wars, it’s hard to stop them,” she informed CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Monday.

“Both sides will tell President Trump that they want to make peace, because that’s what Trump wants to hear. But it’s to Putin’s advantage to keep the status quo as long as possible,” Fordham famous.

“I think we’re seeing that President Trump is getting very frustrated,” she added. “Remember that he promised peace on day one, and also that he really wants the Nobel Peace Prize. And Vladimir Putin has never been in a hurry to make peace. And the circumstances really play to to Russia’s advantage.”

Wiggle room on territory?

When Trump and Zelenskyy held an impromptu assembly on the Vatican on Saturday, at the sidelines of Pope Francis’ funeral, there was once optimism that Ukraine’s chief may have persuaded Trump not to give in to Russian calls for for Ukrainian territorial concessions.

Trump surely appeared extra hard-headed towards Putin after the come upon with Zelenskyy, telling the click on Sunday that he anticipated the Russian president to “stop shooting, sit down and sign a deal” and perilous additional sanctions on Moscow.

In this picture supplied through the Ukrainian Presidential Press Office, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, proper, and President Donald Trump, communicate as they attend the funeral of Pope Francis in Vatican, Saturday, April 26, 2025.

Ukrainian Presidential Press Office by means of AP

But Trump additionally looked as if it would counsel that Zelenskyy was once able to believe ceding Crimea, which Moscow annexed again in 2014, a as a part of a deal — a “red line” the Ukrainian chief had prior to now refused to move. When requested through journalists Sunday if he idea the Ukrainian president was once able to surrender the peninsula, Trump spoke back, “I think so, yeah.”

Zelenskyy in the meantime informed the BBC Friday that his nations does no longer “have enough weapons to return control over the Crimean peninsula” and that “a full and unconditional ceasefire opens up the possibility to discuss everything.”

For Russia’s section, the Kremlin stated on Saturday that Putin was once able for direct negotiations with Ukraine with out preconditions. European diplomats stay skeptical.

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s international coverage leader, informed CNBC on Monday that Russia has no longer proven it needs peace, given its assaults on civilian infrastructure in Ukraine in contemporary weeks. Russia has denied such hostilities towards civilian objectives within the conflict, in spite of more than one moves.

“We know here very well that Ukraine wants peace and it take two to want peace, it only takes one to want war and we see that Russia does not want peace,” Kallas informed CNBC’s Silvia Amaro.

“Russia is the one that is bombing civilians and civilian infrastructure whereas Ukraine has agreed to an unconditional ceasefire over a month ago. So what we need to see is more pressure on Russia so that Russia will also want peace,” she stated, including that the bloc’s place on Crimea’s long term was once unambiguous.

“International law is very clear: Crimea is Ukraine, and I think if Crimea is given away, then the outcome is that it will just embolden aggressors, because it pays off to change the borders by force,” she stated.

Oleksiy Goncharenko, an unbiased Ukrainian lawmaker, stated Monday that “the only obstacle to peace is Russia and Putin, because he doesn’t want peace. We Ukrainians, we want peace as soon as possible.”

Yet, he agreed that there might be room for maneuver in terms of a ceasefire being reached whilst Russia nonetheless occupies Ukrainian land.

The only obstacle to peace is Russia and Putin, says Ukrainian MP

“Ukraine will never recognize any inch of our territory as Russian, but the hostilities can end with an actual control of Russians of part of our territories, which will be illegally occupied. Unfortunately, this will not be the first case in the world’s history, and probably not the last,” he informed CNBC’s “Europe Early Edition” on Monday.

“One day, the Russian Empire will fall apart like it happened before, and we will take them [the territories] back. But for the moment, we can’t kick the Russians out from our territories. But once again, we will never recognize them as Russian. And that should be absolutely clear,” he stated.


Source hyperlink

About Global News Post

mail

Check Also

Kemi Badenoch says nameless Conservative critics are ‘cowards’

Kemi Badenoch says nameless Conservative critics are ‘cowards’

Conservative chief Kemi Badenoch has rejected grievance of her management, pronouncing nameless critics from inside …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *