Harry Potter big name savages JK Rowling as a ‘bigot’ and compares her to Andrew Tate over her trans perspectives – regardless of STILL cashing in at the popularity she introduced him

Harry Potter big name Sean Biggerstaff has savaged JK Rowling on social media, calling her an ‘obsessed billionaire’  and ‘bigoted’ for her perspectives on transgender rights.

The Harry Potter writer, 59, has again and again made headlines for her vocal ‘TERF’ perspectives and has celebrated the Supreme Court‘s landmark judgment that trans girls don’t seem to be legally girls.

Justices in London dominated closing week that within the 2010 Equality Act, the definition of the time period ‘girls’ relates solely to organic girls, and Rowling reportedly helped fund the marketing campaign crew which introduced the case.

Amid well-liked protests following the ruling, Harry Potter actor Biggerstaff – who portrayed Oliver Wood in 3 of the flicks – has passionately condemned Rowling.

Biggerstaff confirmed his harmony with the wizarding franchise’s main stars Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, who’ve all spoken out in opposition to Rowling.

He starred along the trio in first two Harry Potter films – The Philosopher’s Stone and the Chamber of Secrets – and returned for a short lived, uncredited cameo within the Deathly Hallows: Part 2.

Biggerstaff confirmed his harmony with the wizarding franchise’s main stars Daniel Radcliffe (each pictured), Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, who’ve all spoken out in opposition to Rowling

Though distancing himself from Rowling herself and forthrightly talking out in opposition to her, Biggerstaff stays concerned with the broader Harry Potter universe and incessantly attends fan conventions, doing in order not too long ago as February of this yr.

In his diatribe in opposition to Rowling, Biggerstaff spoke back to her arguable publish in regards to the Supreme Court ruling, through which she raised her glass and smoked a cigar on her $150million superyacht in birthday party.

After the billionaire writer was once hit by means of accusations she was once ‘smoking a blunt’, she hit again on social media, clarifying that it was once ‘objectively, provably and demonstratively a cigar’.

Responding to her publish, Biggerstaff claimed she had no sense of humour in regards to the feedback, writing: ‘Bigotry rots the wit.’

He additionally confirmed his improve for one one who when compared her to Andrew Tate for puffing on a cigar, similar to he does in his personal movies, which many argue stir violence in opposition to girls.

The tweet learn: ‘lol, huffing on a cigar now? Is she Andrew Tate?’ with Biggerstaff merely re-posting the phrases to his personal profile.

Rowling additionally shared an image of Susan Smith and Marion Calder, co-directors of For Women Scotland, celebrating the ruling and advised other folks to not ‘f**okay with Scottish girls’.

However, Scotsman Biggerstaff clapped again with: ‘The majority of Scottish girls, who do not believe those d**kheads, don’t seem to be being bankrolled by means of an obsessed billionaire,’ referencing experiences that Rowling helped fund the case.

He additionally confirmed harmony with the main Harry Potter trio as he slammed one consumer who referred to Radcliffe, Watson and Grint as ‘disloyal baggage of s**t’ for talking out in opposition to Rowling, asking how they’re doing as of late.

Rowling, 59, has again and again made headlines for her vocal and arguable perspectives and has celebrated Supreme Court’s landmark judgment that trans girls don’t seem to be legally girls 

In his diatribe in opposition to Rowling, Biggerstaff spoke back to her arguable publish in regards to the Supreme Court ruling, through which she raised her glass and smoked a cigar on her superyacht

He slammed Rowling for sharing an image of Susan Smith and Marion Calder, co-directors of For Women Scotland, celebrating the ruling and advised other folks to not ‘f**okay with Scottish girls’

He additionally confirmed harmony with the main Harry Potter trio as he slammed one consumer who referred to Radcliffe, Watson and Grint as ‘disloyal baggage of s**t’ for talking out 

Biggerstaff moreover rubbished accusations that billionaire Rowling – who’s recently having her Harry Potter books tailored into a brand new TV collection – was once ‘forged out’ for her perspectives

In reaction, an unimpressed Biggerstaff stated: ‘You should not have to marvel. You know what they are doing – main satisfied and a success lives, having no longer pushed their households away with their hateful obsessions.’

Biggerstaff moreover rubbished accusations that billionaire Rowling – who’s recently having her Harry Potter books tailored into a brand new TV collection – was once ‘forged out’ and ‘smeared’ for her perspectives.

Responding to 1 publish, Biggerstaff quipped: ‘Christ, if that is what being forged out seems like I’ll take some,’ relating to her internet value of roughly £1billion.

Biggerstaff shared additional normal posts protecting the transgender group as he shared his opposition to the Supreme Court ruling, arguing that the ‘loudest voices’ had been ‘the use of fear for sex-based rights as quilt for totally reactionary politics’.

‘Today is only a torrent of other folks being willfully simple-minded. A efficiency of pragmatism to cloak their instinctive distaste for the Other,’ he added in some other publish. 

Though he has been vocal in his distaste in opposition to Rowling’s perspectives on transgender rights, Biggerstaff has persisted to money in on his Harry Potter popularity through the years.

He often attends conventions and meet and greets with lovers, showing at a signing on the Gibert-Joseph book shop in France as not too long ago as February 2025.

Biggerstaff additionally attended some other meet and greet in Italy in December 2024 and seemed on the New England WizardFest & Magic Convention in Boxborough in August 2023.

Biggerstaff seemed within the first two Harry Potter films – The Philosopher’s Stone and the Chamber of Secrets – and returned for a short lived, uncredited cameo within the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Distancing himself from Rowling, Biggerstaff stays concerned with the Harry Potter universe and attends fan conventions, doing in order not too long ago as February (pictured at a signing in France)

The Supreme Court case noticed judges rule that trans girls with a gender reputation certificates (GRC) may also be excluded from single-sex areas if ‘proportionate’.

It marked the fruits of a long-running prison fight between the Scottish authorities and girls’s crew For Women Scotland over the definition of a ‘lady’ in Scottish legislation.

The case centred on whether or not someone with a gender reputation certificates (GRC) recognising their gender as feminine will have to be safe from discrimination as a girl beneath the Equality Act.

The Scottish authorities had argued that such other folks had been entitled to sex-based protections, which means a transgender individual with a GRC certificates figuring out them as feminine would depend in opposition to girls’s quota.

But marketing campaign crew For Women Scotland claimed they just implemented to other folks born feminine.

The Supreme Court dominated that the phrases ‘intercourse’, ‘guy’ and ‘lady’ within the Equality Act should imply ‘organic intercourse’, rejecting any choice interpretations as ‘incoherent and impracticable‘.

Rowling reacted closing Wednesday by means of posting on X: ‘It took 3 bizarre, tenacious Scottish girls with a military in the back of them to get this example heard by means of the Supreme Court and, in successful, they have safe the rights of girls and women throughout the United Kingdom. @ForWomenScot, I’m so proud to understand you.’

She later added: ‘Trans other folks have misplaced 0 rights as of late, even if I do not doubt some (no longer all) will likely be livid that the Supreme Court upheld girls’s sex-based rights.’

Amid Rowling’s celebrations, main Harry Potter stars Radcliffe, Watson and Grint have to this point remained silent after talking out in opposition to her prior to now (all pictured in May 2004)  

Amid Rowling’s celebrations, main Harry Potter stars Radcliffe, Watson and Grint have to this point remained silent after talking out in opposition to her prior to now.

They have prior to now spoken publicly in improve of gender ideology – that biologically male trans girls will have to be considered girls – which Rowling disagrees with.

The writer herself seemed to intention a jibe at them closing month, when sharing on her X account a reaction to some other consumer who requested: ‘What actor/actress immediately ruins a film for you?’

Rowling wrote: ‘Three guesses. Sorry, however that was once impossible to resist.’

She prior to now indicated in April closing yr she would no longer forgive Radcliffe nor Watson as she criticised celebrities she stated had ‘cosied as much as a motion intent on eroding girls’s hard-won rights’. 

She hit out at stars accused of the use of their ‘platforms to cheer at the transitioning of minors’ after the discharge of the long-awaited Cass document into gender remedy in the United Kingdom.

That government-commissioned find out about deemed there to be ‘remarkably susceptible proof’ for gender-affirming tactics in kids akin to puberty blockers.

When one fan stated they had been ‘simply looking forward to Dan and Emma [Watson]’ to supply a ‘very public apology’ figuring out they might be secure within the wisdom the writer would forgive them, Rowling wrote: ‘Not secure I’m afraid.

‘Celebs who cosied as much as a motion intent on eroding girls’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer at the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and inclined girls reliant on unmarried intercourse areas.’